The Christian Consumer (3) ‘To Avoid Sin’

Laura Hartman identifies 4 Christian responses to the challenge of consumerism and then unpacks each in detail. She wants to draw on Christian tradition to develop a wise response to contemporary consumerism.

This approach is helpful – it captures how complex the challenge of consumerism is. There is no one obvious ‘Christian response’ but there is depth and riches in the Christian faith by which to think about and engage with consumerism.

Here’s the first one:

1) ‘To Avoid Sin’

This is renunciation of consumption: a call to counter-cultural living as a route to holiness and virtue. Over-consumption is both physically and spiritually damaging.

This is a form of resistance to consumerism that takes the form of frugality, asceticism, self-denial, simplicity, avoidance of complicity in the sin of unneccessary consumption.

Being spiritual is to avoid getting sucked up the desires of the world.

This response has a rather long pedigree since it begins with Jesus and his call to pursue the kingdom of God before material needs.

Hartman takes three representative voices from Church History:

Francis of Assisi (no intro needed): a radical life committed to prayer, preaching and poverty. He ate little, fasted regularly and wore simple clothing.  This ‘avoidance of sin’ was controversial then and even more so after his death.

Francis’ asceticism was a path to holy non-attachment – an act of resistance against the pull of the material world. He is reputed to have said that if he took more than he needed, he would be robbing from the poor.

John Woolman (1720-72, Quaker Abolitionist, who urged avoidance in complicity in the slave trade. For example he refused to use silver, sugar and molasses due to their inextricable link to slavery. (All new to me, sounds like a fascinating character.)

If Francis pursued poverty as an ideal, Woolman sought simplicity. This is far more than a ‘simple lifestyle’ that yet still fits comfortably in the prevailing culture, for the Quakers it was plainness in dress and active detachment from possessions. Woolman resisted luxury since it contradicted God’s will. Luxury is a fruit of evil – it results from overuse of God’s resources (including slaves). Like Francis (and Sider), accumulation of luxury is at the expense of the poor and is sinful.

Ron Sider of Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger among many other things. His clarion call has been for rich (Western) Christians to simplify their lives in order to better help the poor.

Sider’s prophetic style ministry has been designed to shock Christians complicit in a consumer culture into confronting global poverty. If they really believed the Bible they would divest themselves of affluence and develop a passion for justice.  It is evangelicals, who claim to believe the Bible, who are ‘liberals’ when it comes to interpreting what it says on wealth. His call is one to repentance.

Beyond individual responsibility, Sider argues that those who have benefitted from affluence while knowing it is built on systemic injustices and yet do nothing are guilty of sin against God and neighbour.

Sider’s way to be free of sin (or complicity in sin) is for individuals to practice a graduated tithe based on the bare minimum to live on ($30,000 income = $6,300 tithe based on an early chart in 1997).

His point is what should Christians measure their lifestyle on? Rather than taking their base against the norm of a capitalist consumer culture they should begin in comparison to the world’s poor.

Hartman sums up this ascetic tradition well: saying NO to your own desires is saying YES to something better. At its best it is a vision of human flourishing (rather than a negative denial of life).

The ‘avoidance of sin’ or ascetic tradition is not without its critics – but Hartman (rightly) contends it is essential to any truly Christian understanding of consumption.

Here’s my brief observation / question – the ascetic tradition, despite its long and honourable legacy, now seems to be so marginal in Western Christianity as to be almost invisible. It appears to have been swamped by hyper-consumerism and technology as to appear not merely old-fashioned but almost incomprehensible in the modern church …

Or am I missing something?

 

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The Christian Consumer (3) ‘To Avoid Sin’

  1. Hi, Patrick. I really appreciate the call in the book to thoughtful simplicity to help the poor and not unwittingly be a part of a system that harms them. And this does seem to be in terms that are possible without making hard fast rules. By the way, I do like to go for fair trade coffee when I can, though to purchase it on a regular basis in place of the regular coffee we now get seems out of our price range. Hard to go against the grain, expensive to live. But that ought to be something we who profess to follow Jesus work at, hopefully purposeful simplicity becoming more and more a natural part of our lives. Compared to most Americans I suppose I’ve done better, but not well enough I’m sure.

    • Hi Ted, I think your comment catches the difficulties of these issues. Sider, as a modern example of asceticism, has been accused of being naive and simplistic of economic systems, and also importing a type of Pharisiasim (where morality ends up getting assessed by what brands we are or are not using etc). Yet I want to cheer his life-long battle to insist that the systemic issues are moral issues and that God is passionately concerned for the poor and for justice in how the rich relate to the poor.

  2. Thanks, Patrick. I like how you put it.

    Yes, I remember Ronald Sider debating Robert Sirico at Calvin Seminary in 2006. Here is a summary of it from a brother who I think has good insight into economics, Michael Kruse: krusekronicle.typepad.com/kruse_kronicle/2006/10/ronald_sider_an.html#.U9QynBnD9cs
    Sider has become more cautious from what I’ve read, and hopefully that can help in his voice insofar as he is speaking a word from God or solid scriptural teaching to be heard by all, regardless their (American, etc.) political persuasion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s